Eureka

options premium scanner

Market context — 2026-10-23

S&P 500 (SPY)
773.09
VIX
19.0
VIX percentile (1y)
75th
Drawdown from high
-0.8%
vs 200-day avg
+6.4%

Indicators, and what each was measured to predict

IndicatorNowBucket Measured forward return
Implied volatility (VIX) 19.0 normal (15-20) fwd 12m +12.5% (t=0.0, not significant)
Drawdown from high -0.8% at/near highs fwd 1m +0.7% (t=-1.3)
Price vs 200-day average +6.4% above 200dma no significant effect either side (|t| < 1)
Volume vs 20-day average 1.33x busy (1.2-1.6x) no measurable effect at any horizon (all |t| < 1.1)
Pay-cycle position trading day 15 of 15 turn of month inside the turn-of-month window — real pre-1988, statistically dead since 2008 (t=0.29)

Sell-side signal

trend intact Index is 6.4% above its 200-day average — trend intact.

Holding stock: A 200dma exit rule would hold. Historically this rule cut max drawdown in every era tested (1929: -86% to -49%; GFC: -57% to -9%), but its return edge came entirely from 1929-49 and 2000-08 and it has cost about 5.3%/yr since 2009 before tax. Treat it as insurance with a premium, not as alpha.

Selling premium: For selling premium this signal does not apply, and inverting it is worse. Over 428 monthly short puts, selling below the 200dma out-returned selling above it (+7.6% vs +6.4% annualised), and six of the ten worst months began ABOVE the average — two with VIX in the bottom third of its range. Crashes start from calm, so a backward-looking trend filter cannot see them coming. Position sizing limits this damage; timing does not.

Option premium environment

Implied vol is low. Option sellers are collecting thin credits; buyers of premium are paying less than usual for convexity.

What this does and does not tell you

None of these should gate a stock purchase. Every waiting rule tested over 33 years underperformed simply buying on schedule — including VIX>30, the strongest predictor, which cost 11.7%. Deploy on your own cadence; use this panel for context, not permission.

Measured over 97 years of S&P 500 data and 33 years of VIX, with Newey-West standard errors. Volume showed no effect at any horizon. The turn-of-month pay-cycle effect was real before 1988 (t=5.21) and is statistically dead today (t=0.29). Waiting for VIX>30 — the strongest predictor found, t=5.0 for forward 12-month returns — cost 11.7% of terminal wealth over 33 years of simulated paycheck investing, because acting on it meant up to 1,598 consecutive days in cash.

Screening output only — not investment advice. Quotes are delayed roughly 15 minutes and can be stale; verify everything with your broker before trading. Selling options carries risk of substantial loss: a cash-secured put can leave you owning a falling stock, and a covered call caps your upside. Nothing here accounts for your portfolio, position sizing, or circumstances.